← RETURN TO ARCHIVE
REF: 07 / 2026 / APPLIED AI / JURISPRUDENCE02:17 AM
Completed SystemLIVING ARCHIVE ARTIFACT

NyayaBot

AI-powered statutory legal aid system for Indian jurisprudence grounded in verified statutes via a structured RAG pipeline.

NyayaBot
FIGURE 01: VISUAL ARTIFACT COMPOSITION / NYAYABOTANALOGUE IMPASTO & VECTOR STUDY
Architecture & DomainApplied AI / Jurisprudence
Lifecycle StateCompleted System
System Stack & Tooling
PythonStreamlitChromaDBSentence Transformers (all-MiniLM-L6-v2)Legal Query ExpansionDocument Chunking

Overview

CHAPTER 01 / INTENT

Navigating legal systems is notoriously opaque, yet generic LLMs frequently hallucinate legal precedents, misquote statutory sections, and conflate jurisdictions with dangerous consequences. NyayaBot was engineered as a disciplined, hallucination-resistant legal assistance system anchored strictly to verified Indian statutory codes (BNSS, IPC, procedural acts).

Architecture

CHAPTER 02 / DESIGN

NyayaBot enforces a strict Retrieve → Ground → Generate pipeline. Incoming natural language queries are pre-screened with domain classifiers to instantly reject non-legal queries. Legal queries undergo keyword expansion (mapping colloquial terms to statutory nomenclature) before dense vector retrieval in ChromaDB. Only if retrieved passages pass a strict relevance threshold is the LLM authorized to generate a response.

Technical Execution

CHAPTER 03 / SYSTEM
  • Domain Filtering: Keyword classifier rejecting non-legal queries with zero LLM inference cost.
  • Query Expansion: Maps vernacular terms (e.g. FIR) to exact statutory codes (Section 173 BNSS police complaint).
  • Vector Retrieval: ChromaDB cosine similarity over 384-dimensional all-MiniLM-L6-v2 embeddings with top-3 relevance gating (score >= 0.35).
  • Statutory Grounding: Prompt architecture that strictly binds answers to indexed statutory text, prohibiting generative speculation.

Observations

CHAPTER 04 / LESSONS

In high-stakes domains like law, the most crucial architectural feature is not how brilliantly the model speaks, but its ability to decisively refuse to answer when the factual evidence is absent.